Zenism

---

Introduction:
Here I've written a small paper on my ideology "Zenism" a movement created in reaction to "Normism"(normality being no.1)


I haven't been informed on what catholic and protestantism means, I thought catholic = no jesus, protestant = jesus, so that's what CAT and PRO means below.


What's wrong with current society
In nationalsocialism, scientist, engineers, state-workers did whatever they wanted with the mass.
That was wrong, it was eventually fixed.
In individualsocialism, the mass has started doing whatever they want with weirdos.
that is wrong, I expect that to also get fixed.
I expect citizenism with protestant values to replace normism7catholicism.
The normies will be defeat by people simply being responsible citizens.


Skrotnisse vibes
* film camera
* cold colors
* Lo-Fi

Two systems of SMV.
Normism = sociosexuellt värde från ens förmåga att följa sociokulturella normer(not that bidirectionally aligned)
Zenism = sociosexuellt värde från att vara antingen EMP eller INT, you can be some of both at the same time, also act like a damn citizen(Hyper-bidirectionally-aligned)

I need to create a socialist traders/crafters guild.
Don't sell garbage knowingly.
No sharking!

Lojaliteten är till kollektivet, inte individer, "internet is God"- Alexander Bard, golare får polare.
lojalitet till bröder/systrar är cringe, lojalitet till Jesus och internet är king.
Jesus is bidirectionally aligned.

Thoughts on complex murder charge cases
Like I don't think just thinking or threatening on web is enough for life-in-prison.
If you go through with attempt or charge for a hitman that to me is too far.
Can't charge for unexecuted plans as much as for executed plans.
People are to be punished for what they do, not what they think, that would be absurd.

Crimes need Victims
Can't get charged with attempting/planning to kill imaginary people, imaginary friends.
State isn't supposed to decoy people into doing crime, they're supposed to clear disbalances between people.
Handling debts from one person to another.
If someone punches the air you can't charge them for assault.
You're so bad at murder you can't even murder people.
People are charged for damage done as I see it.
The statue with the scale outside the court signals that.

What should one die for?
If you've signed up for work where that's a possibility you only have yourself to blame if you have to.
Like if you have kids, you probably should die for those if it's necessary.
Of if you are the captain of a massive cruise ship.
Like you're going to get life-in-prison anyways for not doing your job.
My morals and life philosophy is very project oriented.
We are all willing to die for something wether it be babies or cigarettes.
Criminal recklessness, written into law.
Don't take more responsibility than you're willing to prepare for.
Always come prepared.
With that said in most jobs you aren't putting your life at stake.


What is rape?
non-consensual sex is what I classify rape.
also minors(below 18s) can't consent so that is rape.
yeah so a 18 year old sleeping with a 17 is rape as much as a 25 year old sleeping with a 5 year old,
so basically someone having sex with a minor can mean a lot of things.

Great Economic Theory
Great economic theory is the idea that through the exchange of goods and services we are evaluating each other as Vincent machines(bidirectional machines).
The market isn't just about getting as much money as possible making great products, it's also about evaluating people according to your spiritual beliefs.
Systems that are good for bidirectional breeding win.
I believe in bidirectional supremacy, politically neutral obsessed swedes don't.
I think about maximizing my bidirectional SMV.
authenticity, transparency, intelligence, or bidirectionally aligned patos, strive, publicness,
loyalty to the global collective, lawfullness, Golare får polare, increases bidirectional SMV.
falseness, malign CPSC, defeatism, not being very public, loyalty to people, decreases SMV.


Nature Orientalist Movements
* E/Nerd
* Nazism
* Zenism
* Communism
* Hinduism
* Buddhism
* Hippie movement




Zenism Rules
* Participate in CPSC-breeding, compete in respecting womens feelings/following sociocultural rules.
* Participate in bidirectional, breeding, INTs, EMPs, just be, but be aware it is a bit chaotic.
That's the base, then if you are doing cat-cap, pro-cap, or communism above that is whatever.
The truthfull and transparent will be rewarded, the false and unreadable will be punished.


Values
What normism and zenism has in common is they are both based around the idea of a sexual market where the individual is a product.
Buth they have different ideas of how individuals are to be judged.
Normists think that individuals are supposed to compete in adhering to sociocultural norms.
This is setup according to the CPSC-model:
Women: casting presses, judges men for their ability to follow sociocultural norms. like cats
Men: Plastic, judged by women for their ability to follow sociocultural norms. like dogs
It is the optimal setup when people just follow squarish sets of rules.
But when you don't follow squarish sets of rules this isn't the ideal setup.
When doing science and creativity you want to tilt the balance a bit more towards creativity rather than rules.
Those with aspergers focus on science/creativity while those that don't have aspergers acts as assistans to those with asperger.
so:
Aspergers, "cats": casting presses, judges those with CPSC for their ability to be of assistance
CPSC, "dogs": plastic, judged for their ability to be of assistance to those with asperger.

This was how it worked in the early 1900s mostly, albeit very anti-women.
science and creativity wasn't a womens job they thought back then.
That stopped because endlessly respecting scientist became seen as immoral, and destructive.
That was basically what nazism was about, the supremacy of science men above all.
Zenism preaches balance between scientist and non-scientist instead.

Normist don't like people with asperger because they are spatially unmindful, but they are so to be maximally creative.

For a person to be considered a *true* zenist they must possess non-regressive bidirectional neurology.
They must not put themselves below the normist.
Or rather one should put themselves besides the normies.
As long as the normist aren't agressive they are to be left alone.

PROBLEMS WITH NORMISM
* Aspergerphobic(doesn't work for people with asperger, which we want in our society)
* Doesn't work for people who lack teachers complex(so people with asperger syndrome)
teachers complex = taking responsibility misperceptions/perceptions
* doesn't work for people who lack impulse control and sometimes breaks laws.
basically doesn't work for people who are a lot, but not too much.
* also people who are "too much"(too reckless), like Breivik, should have greater access to academia, of course still decently separated.
* remember a person "as much"(as reckless) as Werner von Braun operated as head of NASA.
Not that a person of such recklessness should have access to the public, but they should still have access to material to be able to academically/creatively contribute to society.


ZENIST SMV
In Zenism people are ranked either for their:
* creativity, intellect, asperger => makes you a useful "Cat"
AND/OR
* inhibition, sociocultural obedience, social skills => makes you a useful "Dog"
Most people are a bit of both, being highly leaning in one direction is rare.

Low SMV in Zenism is caused by malign CPSC, basically strict adherence to sociocultural rules.


Relevant Political Ideologies
* Zenism
* Social-individualism
* Protestant capitalism
* catholic capitalism


ZENISM
* Post eye-for-eye/teachers-complex rehab/productivity systems:
..* village-separation system, tiers of post-eye-for-eye/teachers-complex.
* asperger-positive society
* Authenticity & productivity



Development of ideal individuals
early 1900s natsoc ideals:
Women respect men, scientist act lawlessly.
economically optimized.
but human-rights wise completely rubbish.
and long-term stability wise rubbish.

mid 1900s NWO:
equal human rights
Individualism
Women judge men for their ability to follow sociocultural rules, laws
very non-destructive, but too anti-masculine.

2020s ZWO:
Equal rights
Individualism
people with asperger judge those with CPSC.
live in parallell with the normist.



In Nazism scientist ruled over the normists.
In normism, science people were seen as weirdos that shouldn't reproduce, you choose between being a family man or a science man
In Zenism scientist and normists live in parallell.